
The year 2016 marked one of the most competitive periods in the history of mobile technology. With dozens of flagship and mid-range smartphones flooding the market, choosing the right device required more than just picking a brand name. The 2016 smartphone comparison guide you are reading exists to cut through the noise, compare real-world performance, and help you identify the device that genuinely fits your lifestyle and budget. Whether you are a photography enthusiast, a power user who demands top-tier processing speed, or someone searching for the best value in a budget-friendly handset, this guide covers every angle with expert-level detail.
What to Prioritize in a 2016 Smartphone Comparison

Before diving into model-by-model breakdowns, it helps to understand the specifications and features that actually matter. Back in 2016, the smartphone comparison landscape shifted dramatically. Manufacturers were competing on display quality, camera innovation, battery endurance, and software ecosystems. Here is what you should weigh carefully:

- Processor and chipset performance – Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 and Samsung Exynos 8890 were the dominant flags, while MediaTek and Qualcomm’s mid-range chips powered more affordable options.
- Display technology – AMOLED and IPS LCD panels were fighting for supremacy, with QHD resolution becoming a standard in premium devices.
- Camera quality – Dual-pixel autofocus, optical image stabilization, and larger sensor sizes defined the year’s best photography smartphones.
- Battery capacity and fast charging – Battery sizes above 3,000 mAh started becoming mainstream, and Quick Charge 3.0 and USB Type-C began appearing on more devices.
- Build quality and design – Metal unibody frames, glass backs, and slim bezels separated premium handsets from plastic-heavy competitors.
- Software and update support – Android 7.0 Nougat and iOS 10 were the latest operating systems, and long-term update commitment varied by manufacturer.
Top Smartphones of 2016 – Head-to-Head Comparison
The following table compares the most talked-about smartphones from 2016 across critical categories. This side-by-side view makes it easier to spot which device leads in the areas that matter most to you.
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy S7 | Apple iPhone 7 | Google Pixel | Xiaomi Mi 5 |
| Display Size | 5.1 inches AMOLED | 4.7 inches IPS LCD | 5.0 inches AMOLED | 5.15 inches IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 QHD | 1334 x 750 | 1080 x 1920 | 1080 x 1920 |
| Processor | Snapdragon 820 / Exynos 8890 | A10 Fusion (announced 2016) | Snapdragon 821 | Snapdragon 820 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 2 GB | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB / 64 GB | 32 GB / 128 GB | 32 GB / 128 GB | 32 GB / 64 GB |
| Rear Camera | 12 MP, Dual Pixel AF | 12 MP, Optical IS | 12.3 MP | 16 MP |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 1960 mAh | 2770 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Water Resistance | IP68 | IP67 | IP53 | None |
| Price at Launch | $649 | $649 | $649 | $360 |

As you can see from this smartphone comparison table, each device carved out a distinct identity in 2016. The Samsung Galaxy S7 offered the best balance of display quality, camera innovation, and water resistance. Apple’s iPhone 7 delivered a tightly integrated iOS experience with excellent video recording capabilities. Google’s Pixel was a newcomer that impressed with a clean Android experience and outstanding camera software. Xiaomi’s Mi 5 proved that flagship-level performance did not have to come with a flagship price tag.
Processor and Performance Deep Dive
When running a 2016 smartphone comparison focused on raw performance, two chipsets dominated the conversation. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 820, found in the Galaxy S7, Pixel, and Mi 5, offered excellent single-thread performance and power efficiency. Samsung’s Exynos 8890, used in international Galaxy S7 variants, competed closely with Snapdragon benchmarks. Apple’s A10 Fusion, introduced with the iPhone 7 and later the iPhone 7 Plus, set new records in single-core performance and set a benchmark standard that competitors struggled to match for years.
For everyday multitasking and gaming, 4 GB of RAM became a meaningful advantage. Devices like the Galaxy S7 and Pixel handled heavy apps and background tasks with ease, while the iPhone 7’s 2 GB of RAM still delivered smooth performance thanks to iOS optimization. Mid-range processors like the Snapdragon 625 and MediaTek Helio X20 powered budget contenders that still offered reliable daily-use performance for casual users.
Best Smartphones by Category in 2016
Best for Photography and Video
The Google Pixel and Samsung Galaxy S7 stood out as the top camera phones of 2016. The Pixel’s image processing pipeline, powered by Google’s computational photography algorithms, produced remarkably detailed and color-accurate shots in virtually any lighting condition. The Galaxy S7’s dual-pixel autofocus system delivered lightning-fast focus acquisition and excellent low-light performance. iPhone 7 excelled in video recording, offering the most stable and cinematic footage among all smartphones tested that year.
Best for Battery Life and Endurance
For users who prioritized all-day battery life, the Samsung Galaxy S7 and Xiaomi Mi 5 offered the most competitive endurance ratings. Both devices packed 3,000 mAh batteries and supported fast charging technologies that could recover a significant portion of battery life in under an hour. The iPhone 7, despite its smaller 1960 mAh battery, still delivered respectable battery life thanks to Apple’s aggressive power management in iOS.
Best Budget and Value Pick
If you were watching your spending, the Xiaomi Mi 5 delivered an astonishing amount of hardware for its price. Packing a Snapdragon 820 chipset, 3 GB of RAM, and a quality AMOLED display, it cost roughly half of what the flagship Galaxy S7 and iPhone 7 did at launch. OnePlus 3, another strong contender, offered 6 GB of RAM and a flagship processor at a price that undercut most of the competition, making it one of the best value smartphones of the entire year.
How to Choose the Right Phone from the 2016 Lineup
Making a final decision among the best smartphones of 2016 depends on your personal priorities. Follow this practical framework:
- Define your budget first. Determine whether you are buying a flagship, a mid-range device, or a value-oriented phone.
- Identify your primary use case. If photography matters most, prioritize camera specifications and software processing. If gaming matters most, focus on processor benchmarks and RAM.
- Consider your ecosystem preference. If you already own a laptop or tablet from a specific brand, staying within that ecosystem often provides better seamless integration.
- Test the phone in person if possible. Even the best-reviewed device may not feel right in your hand. Visit a retail store and hold the phone before committing.
- Check long-term support. In 2016, Google and Samsung offered the most consistent update commitments, while budget brands often left users on older Android versions for longer.
Keep in mind that carrier deals and promotional discounts can shift the effective price significantly. A phone that seemed expensive at full retail price often became highly competitive when bundled with a contract or trade-in offer.
Final Verdict
The 2016 smartphone comparison landscape ultimately reflected a market that was maturing rapidly. Every major manufacturer delivered compelling devices with few outright failures. The Samsung Galaxy S7 remains a standout all-rounder with its impressive camera, vibrant display, and IP68 water resistance. The Apple iPhone 7 is the natural choice for users already invested in the Apple ecosystem who value software longevity and video quality. The Google Pixel delivers a pure, bloat-free Android experience with best-in-class camera software. And for budget-conscious buyers, the Xiaomi Mi 5 and OnePlus 3 proved that you did not need to spend a fortune to get flagship-level performance.
When looking back at the 2016 smartphone comparison from today’s perspective, these devices still hold up remarkably well. Their core innovations — dual-pixel autofocus, AMOLED displays, fast charging, and computational photography — set the stage for the smartphones we use today. Whatever your choice from that era, you made a solid investment in quality mobile technology.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the best overall smartphone in 2016?
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is widely regarded as the best overall smartphone of 2016, thanks to its combination of a stunning AMOLED display, industry-leading camera performance, IP68 water resistance, expandable storage via microSD, and strong battery endurance. It appealed to both casual users and power users without a major compromise in any category.
Which 2016 smartphone had the best camera for low-light photography?
The Google Pixel and Samsung Galaxy S7 delivered the best low-light photography results among 2016 smartphones. The Pixel’s computational photography and HDR+ processing produced cleaner, brighter night shots, while the Galaxy S7’s f/1.7 aperture and dual-pixel autofocus excelled in speed and detail capture in dim environments.
Was the iPhone 7 worth buying in 2016 compared to Android flagships?
The iPhone 7 was absolutely worth buying in 2016 if you valued a smooth, optimized software experience, excellent video recording, and long-term update support. While Android flagships offered more customization, larger screens, and expandable storage, the iPhone 7’s A10 Fusion chip and tight hardware-software integration provided a level of day-to-day reliability that impressed reviewers and consumers alike.
What was the best budget smartphone of 2016?
The Xiaomi Mi 5 and OnePlus 3 were the top budget contenders in 2016. The Xiaomi Mi 5 offered a Snapdragon 820 chipset, 3 GB of RAM, and a premium metal design at around $360. The OnePlus 3 took it a step further with 6 GB of RAM, a Snapdragon 820 processor, and a starting price of approximately $399, making it one of the most powerful budget smartphones ever released at the time.
Did any 2016 smartphone support wireless charging?
Yes. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (with an optional wireless charging cover), the Google Pixel, and the Samsung Galaxy S7 itself all supported wireless charging either natively or through accessories. Apple did not introduce wireless charging until the iPhone 8 in 2017, so the iPhone 7 relied entirely on wired charging solutions.
